As others have said, they must be there. The owner was informed that they were in the building because of their requirements in the authorization group. So they should be willing to pay for them. The A/E may have to cancel the bill for additional coordination. What was the subject of an appeal from If you offered your licence, you probably are unlucky. Never expect the contractor to go through his due diligence and long for the drawings he has in hand to be the most up-to-date… they make a living with extras. Please confirm if there is an option to process this RFI without, if possible, a series of changes for information that is not included in the supporting documents offering set. The permission drawings were submitted to the city for verification.
In the United Kingdom, prisoners serving a fixed sentence (a firm period in prison) are released “on licence” before the end of their full sentence.  The licence is the prisoner`s authorization to maintain certain conditions, such as regular notification to a probation officer and only to an approved address, in exchange for their early release. If they violate the terms of the driver`s licence, they can be “recalled” (returned to prison).   Mass distributed software is used by individuals on pc licensed from the developer of this software. Such a license is usually made in a more comprehensive end-user licensing agreement (CLUE) [necessary clarification] that was concluded when installing this software on a computer. Typically, a license is associated with a unique code that allows the end user to access the software in question when authorizing it. Just as confusion in a patent claim may be relevant to contracts (here), confusion in regulations can also arise. A contract between Acme and WidgetCo states: “Acme must not allow devices to be removed from the premises.” Acme has no policy regarding the removal of equipment from the premises. An employee brings aircraft home, and they`re stolen. Did Acme authorize the employee to bring the equipment home? I imagine Acme and WidgetCo are arguing about it. In the context of a pure licensing agreement, the licensee may, on its terms and under the common law, terminate the contract as it sees fit and without reason, unless it is linked to an interest or rendered irrevocable by contract. An interest-related licence cannot be revoked by the licensee without liability and potential damage.
In the event that a licence is related to an interest, the licensee must give the licensee a reasonable period of time to withdraw that interest from the property prior to termination. Since a licence does not confer any interest on the licensee, the licence is terminated in the event of the sale of the property and cannot be imposed on the new owners of that property. In addition, the death of the licensee or licensee will terminate the contract. Who cares if the permission kit was available… If the offer documents did not refer to the agents, a contractor has no reason or obligation to verify them. If you add an area that sounds like you to the treaty, I expect a series of changes. How did the contractor draw attention to this disparity? It seems that they are aware of the authorization rate and have drawn your attention to the subject. If they had known, they should have asked the question before the auction. If they have not been informed until after the contracts have been awarded, go back to my original paragraph.